🔗 Share this article

Tehran is prepared to resume atomic negotiations with Washington on condition that it is approached with "respect" and "honor", Iran's top diplomat has declared.

Abbas Araghchi declared solely negotiations produced results, and revealed fresh requests had come from go-betweens to reopen negotiations with the Trump administration. He asserted Iran possessed no undeclared nuclear sites, and Tehran had not yet reached a point to permit the International Atomic Energy Agency to access struck enrichment centers for protective measures.

Walking a Challenging Path

The foreign minister is navigating a difficult route since Iran does not want be perceived to be proceeding from a situation of disadvantage, and he emphatically stated that Iran had emerged more powerful in military terms and psychologically from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.

He was addressing at a strategic meeting in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an inalienable right to process nuclear material domestically that it will never give up" – the main reason of the impasse in the prior discussions.

Prior Talks Abruptly Concluded

The prior phases of negotiations between the US and Iran were concluded unexpectedly and bitter end on 12 June when the Israeli government, with American backing, targeted Iran's enrichment centers in a fortnight-long engagement that concluded with the US president declaring the sites had been destroyed. Following this, Western states exercised their privilege to reinstate global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.

Ideal Resolution Proposed

Iranian officials claimed they felt they had attained a "magic solution" to the enrichment issue in earlier negotiations, when it was settled an domestic cooperative with Washington's engagement could refine atomic fuel. Each party would have been able to claim victory since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's nuclear programme was entirely non-military.

It had not been agreed in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could function inside Iran, but that was a reasonable assumption of the consortium proposal. Representatives claimed on multiple occasions they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the agreement to disintegrate due to "detractors in America".

Existing Position

Tehran representatives said the cooperative arrangement was now off the table, but it seems quite possible the offer could be resurrected in various formats if negotiations reopen.

The American leader last week stated he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but privately Iran's diplomats say they are not yet receiving coherent offers from the United States either directly or from significant local go-betweens, such as Qatar, Egypt, the Omani authorities and Saudi Arabia. The Iran's state department has been criticized of passivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran asserts negotiations is not part of a performance.

Political Standpoint

In his speech to the gathering, intended to paint the US as a dominant force that abuses the concept of global regulations, Araghchi said the two-week conflict revealed the conflict could not be ended by military means. He said the strikes started with a American requirement for an total Iran submission and concluded with an absolute demand for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the initial Israeli attacks were carried out with full US knowledge and coordination, making trust challenging to rebuild.

Diplomacy Continues the Primary Resolution

The foreign minister declared: "It was not Iran that had deserted diplomacy; it was America and the western countries that had repeatedly attempted to impose their will during the discussions. Negotiations can still be active and stays the ultimate resolution to settle disagreements, but its criteria, rules and tenets must be followed."

"In case they speak to the citizens of Tehran with the approach of respect and respect, they will get a reply in the identical approach."

Restoration and Recovery

In what is portrayed by Tehran representatives as the struggle of recovery and reconstruction, the foreign minister claimed he was confident Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than prior to 13 or 14 June of this year. Every aspect of our defense have been rebuilt. We gained numerous insights from this conflict; we have discovered our internal vulnerabilities and the vulnerabilities of the enemy."

He added: "We effectively endured this war. Our nuclear technology, which they aimed to eliminate, remains in place. The sites and machinery, if damaged, will be restored; what is crucial is the will of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they targeted, but failed to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have grown more resilient, more united, and more backing of the leadership and the country in the wake of this invasion."